MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6982631652

“It Felt Like a Sense of Rape:” Women’s Experiences of Strip Searching in Prison as Gendered, Misogynoir, and Colonial Genocidal Sexual Violence

2023· article· en· W6982631652 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrisonColonialismState (computer science)IndigenousThematic analysisMeaning (existential)Sexual violenceExploratory researchHistorical traumaInterpersonal communicationRacism
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previously imprisoned women have long been sounding the alarm about the harms of strip searching and calling for it to be banned. However, it remains a routine prison practice and research into it is scant. Furthermore, Canada is incarcerating Indigenous women at genocidal levels and disproportionately imprisoning Black women. Therefore, my research explored the use of strip searching in federal prisons through anti-colonial and anti-racist feminist frameworks, specifically, abolition feminism. My research was grounded in the ethic of relational accountability and centred reciprocity, respect, and responsibility in each phase. I gathered stories from 23 formerly incarcerated women from across Canada about their experiences of being strip searched in federal prison; ten identified as Indigenous[1], six as Black, one as racialized, five as white, and one is exploring her ancestry. Women shared their experiences in virtual sharing circles following Anishinaabe circle protocol, and through individual conversations. My meaning making process included a combination of thematic analysis and a unique method I developed which comprised of listening to the recorded conversations while on the land of a federal prison to facilitate more wholistic and embodied ways of knowing. The findings of my research confirm what women with lived experience of strip searching have been saying for decades – the state is a sexual abuser. My research builds on this and offers additional insights into the gendered, misogynoir, and colonial genocidal nature of strip searching. Furthermore, it renders both the state and its agents as sexual abusers as strip searching is both structural and interpersonal sexual violence. Many of the logics inherent in strip searching extend from practices of anti-Black slavery and gendered colonial genocide and replicate the abusive dynamics of intimate partner violence. Importantly, women resisted this state-inflicted sexual violence in myriad ways. My research has important implications for social work and the broader movements of gender and sexual violence prevention. Furthermore, it provides clear direction to administrators of carceral settings such as jails and prisons. Efforts to abolish the use of strip searching are required at micro, mezzo, and macro levels, and should be a priority for social workers. [1] Indigenous women came from various Territories and Nations, which they describe in Chapter 4.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.253

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0220.023
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University)→Same topicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations→French-language works237,207→