MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6982680611

Islanding protection of synchronous distributed generators using intelligent relays

2015· dissertation· en· W6982680611 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Issues in Education
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIslandingRelayDistributed generationTrippingProtective relayElectric power systemDependabilityDigital protective relayBenchmark (surveying)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The penetration of distributed generation (DG) in electrical distribution systems has been consistently increasing due to its great potential to improve system performance in terms of reliability, power quality and loss reduction. However, achieving these benefits is not trivial given the diverse issues resulting from distributed generation integration. One of them is the islanded operation of DGs since such operation generates hazards for human safety and compromises electrical network quality and infrastructure. It is thus current practice, according to DG Interconnection Guidelines to disconnect all DGs upon unintentional islanding detection. This thesis proposes the use of Intelligent Relay (IR) as a passive device for islanding detection of synchronous DGs and outlines the setting methodology. The intelligent relay employs multi-variate analysis and data mining techniques to extract the patterns of islanded synchronous DGs from time-domain features obtained from off-line simulation of typical islanding events. The captured islanding signature for any DG is represented in the form of a Decision Tree (DT) which determines the tripping logic, protection handles and thresholds of the Intelligent Relay.A distribution feeder with multiple DGs connected is modeled in Simulink as a benchmark system for Intelligent Relay testing. The performance of the IR is quantified in terms of Dependability and Security indices and is compared to the performance of conventional passive protective relays. In order to simulate realistic situations, a variety of operating conditions is configured and operating condition-dependent dedicated IR settings are obtained. The validity and applicability of the obtained IR settings are examined for an unknown set of islanding and non-islanding events including the ones originating from symmetrical, asymmetrical and arcing shunt faults. Last, but not least, a method is proposed to use the high-performance dedicated relay settings in an adaptive fashion in order to accommodate a range of similar operating conditions, thus avoiding repetitive IR training. The IR was found to exhibit consistently superior overall performance to all considered currently used passive protective devices. It also features a much smaller Non-Detection-Zone by virtue of its superior performance for islanding conditions where the load and the formed island generation are nearly balanced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.518
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it