La cuestión morisca en la Península Ibérica: estudio de la temática a través del análisis de la pintura sobre tela "Expulsión de los moriscos en el puerto de Alicante". Estudio de un caso concreto
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[EN] This final degree essay analyzes the theme of the expulsion of the Moorish from the Iberian Peninsula in 1609 during the reign of Felipe III, and more concretely how happened this historic issue in the Kingdom of Valencia. This affair is studied throughout the pictorial set of seven paintings on canvas, entrusted to Valencian painters by the king through the marquis of Caracena. These paintings reflect this event in different points of the Kingdom in the Mediterranean stripe, when the Moorish were forced to embark to the North of Africa. \n \n Currently, of the seven work of art, six of them belong to the pictorial funds of the Fundación Bancaja (Embarque de los moriscos en el Grau de Valencia, Embarque de los moriscos en el puerto de Vinaròs, Embarque de los moriscos en el puerto de Dénia, Rebelión de los moriscos en la Sierra de Laguar, Rebelión de los moriscos en la Muela de Cortes y Desembarco de los moriscos en el puerto de Orán), being the seventh of them of particular property (Expulsión de los moriscos en el puerto de Alicante) \n \n This essay is focused in the study of the copy made of the painting Expulsión de los moriscos en el puerto de Alicante, developing a historiographical and stylist detailed analysis of the piece. The purpose is to know the temporal closeness between the original piece and the copy. By the same way, a technical and conservative research has been made to assess the damages and pathologies that the piece presents and to stablish proper guidelines to a possible intervention and the correct preventive conservation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".