MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6982871002

Lâexploitation agricole du Mas de Fourques aux Ier et IIe siècles de notre ère (Lunel, Hérault)

2010· article· fr· W6982871002 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePersée (Ministère de lEnseignement supérieur et de la Recherche) · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicEthics in Business and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)DebitagePeriod (music)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1500 m au nord de la ville de Lunel (Hérault), l’établissement agricole du Mas de Fourques apparaît au milieu du Ier s. ap. J. ‑C., et est abandonné à la fin du IIe s. Il est situé dans une zone de piémont de costière, dans les marges des territoires des agglomérations gallo-romaines d’Ambrussum et de Lunel-Viel, secteur faiblement occupé au haut Empire. La fouille réalisée durant l’été 2006 sur un demi-hectare a révélé trois bâtiments couvrant une surface supérieure à 420 m ² : un logis, une probable bergerie et un chai. Quelques hectares de vigne, quelques fruitiers, peut-être un peu de bétail : l’étude conduit à souligner la modestie des structures de production du Mas de Fourques. Le piémont, et a fortiori les costières, demeurent semble-t-il à l’écart du développement de l’agriculture extensive que connaissent les zones basses durant le haut Empire. Peut-être la petite exploitation à vocation polyculturale est-elle la mieux à même de faire valoir ces terroirs marginaux ?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.218
GPT teacher head0.447
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePersée (Ministère de lEnseignement supérieur et de la Recherche)Same topicEthics in Business and EducationFrench-language works237,207