Lateral likeness and legion : a psychoanalytic film study of siblingship in <em>The color wheel</em>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Narcissism not only influences, but can define the sibling relationship in psychoanalytic theory.The distinction of the sibling relationship is identified and discussed in psychoanalytic theory and film theory.Upon analysis, it is clear that film can relate the reality that siblings are substantial psychic forces on one another and against others."Lateral Likeness and Legion" involves discovering how the sibling relationship can be significant in psychoanalytic film theory.Literature surrounding psychoanalytic theory and film theory is reviewed and correlated to a case study of The Color Wheel.This study shows how narcissism can define siblingship cinematically through the emergent themes in the literature of labour, loss, and legion [correlative to the Self].The Color Wheel depicts this in its narrative of siblings.The film follows a brother and a sister who reunite after being estranged.Siblings are distinct markers of narcissism in addition to development and catharsis in film.This project establishes the significance of siblings in psychoanalytic film theory.August 28, 2018 I would also like to thank Sam Vaknin, PhD who kindly responded to my inquiries about narcissism in accordance to psychoanalytic theory for this project.Without his feedback, my queries would have remained unresolved.I would additionally like to acknowledge my alma mater, Dalhousie University, whose campus has consistently provided me with closure, support, and resources through my studies.Its prodigious collections along with staff and students cultivate a heartening ambiance which not only anchored me through this thesis, but afforded me avenues to prospective scholarship.Finally, I must express my very profound gratitude to my parents and to
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".