L'Education Physique Quotidienne de Qualité : analyse de transposition au système belge francophone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
LâEducation Physique Quotidienne de Qualité (EPQQ) est apparue en 1988 au Canada. Le programme est lancé par Education Physique et Santé Canada (EPS Canada) en réponse à des besoins de santé, pédagogiques et économiques. LâEPQQ a depuis démontré quâelle engendrait de multiples bienfaits dans ces domaines. Lâobjectif de notre mémoire consiste à analyser si ce programme est viable en Belgique francophone, sous quelles conditions et limites. Nous avons approfondi le domaine de lâEPQQ essentiellement à travers les publications dâEPS Canada. Nous avons ensuite exploré le domaine de la viabilité afin de dégager une série de critères pertinents. Une étude des deux contextes a été entreprise afin de répondre à ces critères. Pour ce faire, nous nous sommes appuyés sur des publications officielles, des rapports et de la littérature scientifique. Ce mémoire met en évidence que le programme EPQQ est viable en Belgique francophone mais sous certaines contraintes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".