L'Education Physique Quotidienne de Qualité : analyse de transposition au système belge francophone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’Education Physique Quotidienne de Qualité (EPQQ) est apparue en 1988 au Canada. Le programme est lancé par Education Physique et Santé Canada (EPS Canada) en réponse à des besoins de santé, pédagogiques et économiques. L’EPQQ a depuis démontré qu’elle engendrait de multiples bienfaits dans ces domaines. L’objectif de notre mémoire consiste à analyser si ce programme est viable en Belgique francophone, sous quelles conditions et limites. Nous avons approfondi le domaine de l’EPQQ essentiellement à travers les publications d’EPS Canada. Nous avons ensuite exploré le domaine de la viabilité afin de dégager une série de critères pertinents. Une étude des deux contextes a été entreprise afin de répondre à ces critères. Pour ce faire, nous nous sommes appuyés sur des publications officielles, des rapports et de la littérature scientifique. Ce mémoire met en évidence que le programme EPQQ est viable en Belgique francophone mais sous certaines contraintes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".