MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6983221999

A longitudinal analysis of the predictors and consequences of prenatal antidepressant use among women requiring these medications before pregnancy

2015· dissertation· en· W6983221999 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHistory of Computing Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPregnancyDiscontinuationMedical prescriptionAntidepressantDepression (economics)Cohort studyConfoundingDrugs in pregnancy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To explore the characteristics associated with antidepressant discontinuation in pregnancy compared to non-pregnant women taking antidepressants.Methods: Pregnant women delivering between January 1 st , 1998 and December 31 st , 2002 were identified using Quebec's health administration databases.Women with at least one prescription for an antidepressant in the six months before pregnancy were matched to up to three non-pregnant women on age and date of first prescription filled in the pre-pregnancy period.Women were considered to have discontinued medication if they had filled at least one prescription in the six month pre-pregnancy period, and then had no prescriptions filled during pregnancy.Multivariable log binomial regression was used to assess the association between demographic, health and medication characteristics, and antidepressant discontinuation in pregnancy.We also assessed the risk of hospitalization in stoppers vs. continuers using propensity score analysis.Results: Pregnant women were 4.96 (95% CI: 4.30 to 5.72) times more likely than non-pregnant women to discontinue antidepressant use, and 53% of pregnant women discontinued all antidepressant use in pregnancy.Pregnant women were more likely to discontinue antidepressant use if they were younger, not receiving welfare, and had a shorter duration of pre-pregnancy antidepressant use.Women receiving TCAs, MAOIs or atypical antidepressants before pregnancy were more likely to discontinue than those on SSRI monotherapy.Discontinuers were less likely to be hospitalized for mental health problems after 16 weeks of gestation compared to women with continuous antidepressant use in early pregnancy (0.22; 95%CI: (0.08, 0.68). Conclusion:Our results suggest that pregnant women with less severe disease are more likely to discontinue treatment, but because pregnancy itself is a major predictor of discontinuation, physicians need to pay particular attention to pregnant women requiring pre-pregnancy

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.283
Threshold uncertainty score0.563

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicHistory of Computing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207