MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6983277116

Mapping areas of interest for coastal enhancement related to
\ncapelin spawning in Conception Bay, Newfoundland and Labrador

2023· dissertation· en· W6983277116 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicJungian Analytical Psychology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapelinBayCoveHarbourSpawn (biology)OverwashAerial surveyCoastal management
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Capelin is a forage fish species that plays a key role in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) marine ecosystems. The species tends to spawn on beaches possessing specific environmental characteristics, such as gentle slopes and granular sediment sizes. Many beaches on the island of Newfoundland have been modified by humans and are no longer suitable for capelin spawning. Coastal enhancement work, which could help increase the suitability of beaches for capelin spawning, requires an understanding of beach dynamics and geomorphology to identify suitable sites for enhancement and long-term effectiveness. Three beaches along Conception Bay, NL were examined to inform potential future coastal enhancement work: Lance Cove, Chapel’s Cove, and Harbour Main. Aerial photos and digital surface models (DSM) of the beaches were acquired at different times throughout 2019 using an uncrewed aerial vehicle, complemented by field observations. A multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach was then used to provide a systematic way to prioritize these beaches for enhancement suitability. The MCDA prioritization accounts for key components of capelin spawning, wind direction, beach protection, sediment grain size, slope, and anthropogenic footprint.
\nKey components were addressed both in terms of capelin spawning suitability and coastal stability. DSM and geomorphological data indicate that beaches experience different changes throughout a season, although they present somewhat similar physical characteristics. Adjacent beaches can exhibit very different responses to the same weather event, indicated by the geomorphic dynamics of Lance Cove, Chapel’s Cove, and Harbour Main. Of the three sites, Chapel’s Cove is most suitable for coastal enhancements to make the beach more suitable for capelin spawning. Chapel’s Cove is more dynamically stable than Lance Cove, and is much less anthropogenically influenced than is Harbour Main. Findings demonstrate the key factors
\ninfluencing beach geomorphology and how it pertains to planning species-specific enhancement projects, building on the idea that enhancement projects require a multi-dimensional approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.300
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)Same topicJungian Analytical PsychologyFrench-language works237,207