Méthode de la lecture, lecture de la méthode : l'acte de lecture en didactique de la traduction (Canada)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude entend questionner l’impensé de la lecture et de la textualité sous-jacent aux modèles traductologiques orientés vers le processus qui se sont imposés en didactique de la traduction au cours des quatre dernières décennies, tels que la théorie interprétative de l’École de Paris et la théorie fonctionnaliste du Skopos de l’École allemande, et qui sous-tendent actuellement la formation des traducteurs professionnels au Canada. On trouvera dans ces pages, après un survol de l’histoire de cette formation, une confrontation dialogique entre les fondements immanentistes des approches qui y sont dominantes et ceux de théories issues du champ littéraire ayant problématisé l’acte de lecture, ainsi que l’analyse de la traduction collective d’une œuvre de fiction (réalisée par une équipe de traducteurs diplômés du premier cycle) dont le but est d’étayer la critique métathéorique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".