MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6983622622

Muslim communities and Covid-19: A report on the impacts of the Coronavirus pandemic on Muslims in Birmingham

2022· other· en· W6983622622 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBCU Open Access Repository (Birmingham City University) · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicEthnic groupQuarter (Canadian coin)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)AnxietyPublic healthPrayerFaithPsychological intervention
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Covid-19 pandemic impacted on Muslim communities in Birmingham in a number of distinctive ways for Muslims as a faith group. National level data on ethnicity and Covid-19 indicates that groups which are predominantly Muslim, namely Bangladeshi and Pakistani groups, were among those most severely impacted in the first wave of the pandemic. As the second and third waves of the pandemic played out, mortality risks from Covid-19 remained highest for individuals of Bangladeshi backgrounds, with Pakistani groups also remaining at an elevated level of risk. Findings from our stage 1 questionnaire carried out with 72 Muslims living in Birmingham as a scoping exercise indicated that disparate health impacts experienced by participants were broadly consistent with the above. Around 21% of participants reported working in an environment with an elevated risk of exposure to Covid 19, and this is higher than the national average for the proportion of key workers from minority ethnic groups, who made up 14% of key workers in the first quarter of the pandemic (ONS 2020). 51% of participants reported experiencing stress or anxiety, with this appearing to impact most for those aged 25-34, with 68% reporting stress or anxiety directly resulting from the pandemic. 32% of all participants reported a change in prayer habits with 51% of men reporting a change compared with just 10% of women. The proportion of participants who were unvaccinated was 18%, which is 5.5 percentage points higher than the national average for Bangladeshi groups of 12.5%, and 2 percentage points higher than the national average of 16% for Pakistani groups (ONS 2022c). When broken down across ethnic group, 25% of participants who identified as Bangladeshi were unvaccinated compared with 13% of Pakistani participants. This shows that whilst the proportion of participants who identified as Pakistani that were unvaccinated is lower than the national average by two percentage points, the proportion of Bangladeshi participants who were unvaccinated was double the proportion of Bangladeshis who were unvaccinated in the national population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.606
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.167
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBCU Open Access Repository (Birmingham City University)Same topicDiverse Scientific and Economic StudiesFrench-language works237,207