MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6983667647

A networked army: the Australian Military Forces and the other armies of the interwar British Commonwealth (1919-1939)

2021· dissertation· en· W6983667647 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic diversity and population structure
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommonwealthHistoriographyInterwar periodEmpireBritish EmpireMilitary theoryMilitary historyImperial unit system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Australian Military Forces (AMF) of the interwar period was a networked institution. Between 1919 and 1939 AMF leadership developed, maintained, or extended interaction between their force (and its officers) and the other armies of the British Empire. These interactions formed sophisticated inter-army connections—pathways for liaison and the exchange of information in military developments—that facilitated cooperability in peace and war. Such linkages were grounded in structural ties, based on the mobilities of individuals, or reliant on the personal initiative of officers. Through such means the AMF was embedded within an imperial military structure that defended the empire, and which included the armies of Britain, British India, New Zealand, Canada, and South Africa. By examining the varied ways in which the AMF was connected to its empire counterparts in the interwar period this thesis corrects longstanding assumptions and stereotypes of that force, emphasising that this was not a time of intellectual or physical isolation from military developments occurring in other Commonwealth armies. Additionally, through the insights of the historiographical approach known as network theory (popular in imperial histories but rarely applied to the military context) this thesis demolishes the outmoded core-periphery model of the military structure of the interwar British Empire to reveal a pan-empire network of military interaction that involved each army in mutually beneficial information and communication flows. Utilising deep archival research on four continents, previously unexplored source material, and modern historiographic approaches, this thesis presents an innovative and original analysis of the AMF’s relationships with the other armies of the interwar British Empire, its place within an imperial military structure, and the inter-army connections that fostered Commonwealth military cooperability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.243
Threshold uncertainty score0.483

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicGenetic diversity and population structure→French-language works237,207→