MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6983772814

NTAA Award, International New Technology Art Award

2022· other· en· W6983772814 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDocument Server@UHasselt (UHasselt) · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJuryCONTESTOfficerChief executive officerChoirArtilleryDemocracy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Zebrastraat - Zebrastraat 32/001 - 9000 Ghent - België\nOrganisation: Liedts-Meesen Foundation\n\nIn reply to the call for entries for the international contest New Technological Art Award (NTAA) 2022, 836 candidates representing 72 nationalities worldwide have applied.\n\nOut of these projects, an international jury has selected 20 nominees:\n\nHaseeb Ahmed (US/BE) – Stock Weather (2020)\nBull.Miletic (NO) – Ferriscope (1893 – 2020) (2020)\nPeter Burr (US) – Dirtscraper (2020)\nPeter de Cupere (BE) – Olfabet (2021)\nFélicie d’Estienne d’Orves (FR) – Martian Sun Series (2019)\nŞölen Kıratlı (TR/US), Hannen Wolfe (US), Alex Bundy (US) – Cacophonic Choir (2019)\nEgor Kraft (RU/AT) – Content Aware Studies Series (2020)\nLarbitsSisters (BE) – Crypto Miner Car (2021)\nCarolin Liebl & Nikolas Schmid-Pfähler (DE) – RE:PLACES (2021)\nFelix Luque Sánchez (SP/BE) – Perpetuité I (2021)\nJulian Palacz (AT) – Handle with Care (2021)\nGiacomo Piazzi & Matthias Pitscher – The Chiromancer (2020)\nTivon Rice (US) – Models For Environmental Literacy (2020)\nIrakli Sabekia (GE) – Voicing Borders (2019)\nTheresa Schubert (DE) – mEat me (2020)\nLing Tan (UK) – Playing Democracy (2020)\nTimothy Thomasson (CA) – Slow Track (2021)\nNathan Thompson, Guy Ben-Ary, Sebastian Diecke (AU) – Bricolage (2020)\nJeroen van Loon (NL) – Permanent Data (2020)\n::vtol:: (RU) – Floating Point Number (2019)\n\nThe jury members who casted their vote were Yves Bernard (founder of iMAL, curator and artist), Edwin Carels (curator new media exhibitions), Jean-Marie Dallet (artist, research professor at the Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne), Tom Dekyvere (artist), Nick Ervinck (artist, winner of the update_2 public award), Ralph Dum (scientific officer and senior expert of the European Commission), Karen Helmerson (program director for Electronic Media, Film & Visual Art at the New York State Council on the Arts (NYSCA)), Julien Maire (artist and laureate of the update_2 jury prize), Françoise Meesen (Liedts-Meesen Foundation), Alain Thibault (artistic director ELEKTRA Montreal) and Stef Van Bellingen (consultant for Zebrastraat / artistic leader VZW Warp).\n\nNTAA Award, International New Technology Art Award, Zebrastraat, Ghent, BE, 05.02 -13.05.2022

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.147
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0070.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2220.075

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDocument Server@UHasselt (UHasselt)French-language works237,207