Nuevos proyectos para un hospital provincial en Huelva : hacia la búsqueda de la modernidad sanitaria a principios del siglo XX
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En este artículo ven la luz dos nuevos proyectos para un Hospital provincial en el Huerto de Roma en la ciudad de Huelva en 1911. Estos pasaron por ciertas adversidades durante el primer cuarto del siglo XX, quedando en el olvido ante la respuesta por parte de la Diputación Provincial de construir un nuevo centro sanitario en el paraje conocido como Huerta de Mena (propiedad de la Riotinto Company Limited) en 1936, y la posterior construcción del Hospital provincial Infanta Elena en 1985. Los proyectos realizados por los arquitectos Moisés Serrano y Trinidad Gallego se englobaron dentro de la estilística arquitectónico del modernismo y del eclecticismo decimonónico. Ambos proyectos contarían con las condiciones higiénicas y sanitarias más avanzadas del momento._______________________________This article deals with two new projects \nfor a County Hospital in `Huerto de \nRoma' in the city of Huelva in 1911. Both \nprojects faced some difficulties during \nthe first quarter of the 20' century, being \nfinally forgotten since the County Council \ndecided to build a new hospital in the place \nknown as `Huerta de Mena' (property \nof Riotinto Company Limited) in 1936 \nand the later construction of Infanta \nElena County Hospital in 1985. \nThe projects carried out by M.S. and T.G. \nwere classified into Modernism and 19" \ncentury eclecticism architectural styles. \nIn addition both projects would have \nhad the most advanced health and hygienic \nconditions of the time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".