Bibliographic record
Abstract
presentation, "Merton, Symbolism, and Sophia: the Power of the Name" explored Thomas Merton's prophetic critique of the corruption and breakdown of language in an increasingly fragmented technological and violent world.In particular, he emphasized Merton's recognition of the impact of fear upon culture and society-a fear that resulted in increased alienation, isolation, and individualism.In response he stressed Merton's turn to Wisdom-Sophia as lyric symbol of divine-human relationality and the "communal eros" that is the very life of God.At this point, his paper had clear resonance with Aristotle Papanikolaou's paper from the 2009 convention.Drawing from his close study of Russian sophiology, biblical Wisdom literature, and Zen, Sophia emerges in Merton's writings, Pramuk argued, as a sacrament and revealed name for the mystery of God's union with the world in Christ and the invitation for all creation to participate in the unfolding life story of God.The "remembrance of Sophia," Pramuk maintained, gestures toward a mystical-prophetic spirituality of engagement with the world.Pramuk illustrated his presentation drawing from the prose, sketches, and poetry of Merton with a particular emphasis on "Hagia Sophia" written in 1962.In his presentation, "Trinity as a Model of Organization in both Science and Religion" Michael Crosby recalled that in Caritas in Veritate , Pope Benedict XVI stated that Trinitarian relations are key to rightly ordered relationships.The more we know from science about the natural order of things, Crosby suggested, the more we fi nd revealed the footprints of the Economic Trinity whose "reign" or "governance" must be worked out in the "economy of salvation" at every level.He argued that all relationships must ultimately refl ect their origin in Trinitarian relationships.Drawing from the fi eld of economics, he expounded a "business model" of the Economic Trinity.He concluded by emphasizing the task of theologians both to "ensure" the integrity of the Trinitarian vision they proclaimed and to prophetically remind the Christian community of the ongoing call to witness to the gospel and promote the Kingdom.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.286 | 0.086 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".