Bibliographic record
Abstract
This photographic work emerges from a body of research that has gained momentum over the last year and was included in the Photo-London 2006 in the form of an artist’s talk in the Royal College of Art hosted by Jean Wainwright (Art Monthly). The public event was previewed in Pluk magazine. Other group exhibitions of the work include The Apexarts, New York (July 07), the Kunsthall, Bergen, Norway (Sept 07) and the Northern Bounds Exhibition, Videographie, Montreal (Nov 07).\n\nOver the last two years the research practice has developed a body of photographic works that look at the process of historical narrative, by interrogating the role of the artefact. The approach explores our sense of historical knowledge and identity that creates a reciprocal relationship between past and present. \n\nThe work begins with the singular vernacular photographic image of Bobby Sands; the first of 1981 Republican Hunger Striker. The project negotiates an axis between the historical and the psychological to reveal a contested history in post-conflict societies.\n\nAn archaeological theoretical approach (Foucaultian and Freudian) excavates the anachronistic object; either visual, site or memory-based. \n\nIn September 2006 a series of photographs were exhibited and an invited artist talk offered as part of the 9th International Syrian Photography Festival, Aleppo, Syria. \n\nThe festival comprised of international and Syrian photography and the work selected consisted of four large-scale images (60 cm x 40cm) from the Maze Prison, Northern Ireland. \nThe work formed a curatorial group exhibition at the Du Pont Gallery with artists Rini Hurkmanns and Lalla Esssaydi amongst others. The invited artists talk discussed the photographic work and the martyr relationship between Irish Republicanism and the Islamic Republic of Iran. This festival has been reviewed online, for instance \nhttp://www.fotofest.org/abroad/syria/aleppo06.htm
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.598 | 0.345 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".