Bibliographic record
Abstract
Western Washin g ton and western Or egon appear to be about the only sections of the Unit ed States where filb erts are grown successfully in a commercial way.Commercial plantings in the eastern states have not been profitable.The climate in Wa shin g ton and Oreg on w es t of the Cascade mountain s seems to be excellent for filb ert s.In the Northwes t there are tr ees over forty years old which are still vigorous .The filbert tree and poll en catkin s will u sually with stand zero temperatures but the pistillate or nut b earing blossoms may be injured at 12 to 15 F. This plant prefers t emp eratures below 100F.and above 15F.A crop failure in western Wa shington has seldom occurred.Spring frosts and winter rains have not proved harmful.To date no se ri o u s pest s have appeared.Production costs are comparatively low.Th e nut s ripen in late September and early Octo ber, w h en mo s t ot h er crop s are out of the way, and do n o t require careful handlin g, precooling o r cold storage.Mature orchards are n ow producin g profitable crops in the Vancouver, Washington di strict, and certain parts of the Willamette Valley of Ore go n .Young bearin g o rchard s are d o ing well at Sedro Woolley, No o k sack, S ea ttle, Kirkland, Puyallup and in the Chehali s secti on.Th e consumption of nuts a s a g roup , is increasing out of proporti o n to populati o n in cr ease.Th e average per capita yearly consumptio n of filbert s is one-quarter pound.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".