MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6986077463

Obesity Risk Estimation Accounting Spatial Dependency, Error in Covariate Measurement, and Factors Operating at Multiple Levels

2023· dissertation· en· W6986077463 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCovariateEstimationSpatial analysisSmall area estimationObservational errorRegression analysisSpatial epidemiologyRegressionType I and type II errors
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Disease mapping has long been a part of public health, epidemiology, and the study of disease in human populations. Hierarchical spatial models for areal data address the competing goals of accurate small area estimation and fine-scale geographic resolution in disease mapping simultaneously, and it has become a fertile area of research over the last two decades. More recently, there has been increased uptake of the methods in applied research. Nonetheless, there is still scope for the methodological developments. This thesis contributes to the uptake of disease mapping in applied health research through key areas: methodological development, implementation, and application. Chapters 1 and 2 of this thesis provide a brief review of literatures on spatial model, measurement error model, and obesity research. These chapters also summarize methods and data to be utilized in this thesis. Chapter 3 presents an applied research work that demonstrates the importance of incorporating spatial autocorrelation from the observed data into a statistical model, via real and simulated data. The analysis of real data across 117 health regions of Canada is of practical interest, as it identified several obesity clusters with discernible spatial patterns throughout Canada. Chapters 4 and 5 of the thesis present two research works on methodological development. First, covariate measurement error provides biased estimates in standard regression model, violating underlying assumption. In Chapter 4, the classical and Berkson measurement error models were integrated with the well-known Besag-York-Mollie (BYM2) model to incorporate covariate measured with error. The simulation results revealed that the use of a measurement error model for an error-prone covariate in BYM2 model has the advantage of producing a superior fit. The results also demonstrate that a BYM2 model without taking into account covariate measurement error may lead to highly biased estimates for certain parameters. The proposed method was applied for estimating socio-economic and environmental factor’s effect on the obesity counts using aggregated data for 117 health regions of Canada. Second, optimal prediction of risk for an adverse health condition risk at population level requires integrating covariates from multiple levels into a single modeling framework. However, it is a common practice to estimate effects of individual and group-level covariates using multiple models independently. To overcome this methodological gap, this thesis formulated the joint BYM2 model in Chapter 5, that integrates individual- and group-level models through association parameter. The simulation results revealed that the joint BYM2 model performed the same or better than the independent estimation for recovering parameter values. The capability of the proposed model was demonstrated through estimating the risk of developing unhealthy health condition among Canadian secondary school students, integrating individual-, school-, and neighbourhood-level covariates. The neighbourhood-level model incorporated spatially correlated count data and covariates measured with error. Finally, in Chapter 6, the overall findings from this thesis and potential directions for future work are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207