MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6986136230

Cover story

2006· other· en· W6986136230 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueWestminsterResearch (University of Westminster) · 2006
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrgan and Tissue Transplantation Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExhibitionPresentation (obstetrics)Context (archaeology)Identity (music)Face (sociological concept)AvatarCover story
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interactive digital video installation that explores the potential impact of face transplants on appearance and identity. Other relevant details:\n\nThis research project explores the facial expression of human identity. Cover Story draws on 'real life' experiences of people\n\nwith facial differences and questions what the idea of living without a viable face means. This three-part video installation\n\nexamines the role of the face in human communication and dynamically investigates the implications of a face that cannot\n\nexpress identity or emotion.\n\nControversial issues relating to facial appearance and loss of facial identity are here raised in accessible and non-threatening\n\nways suitable to a public site cutting across art, science and public contexts.\n\nThe installation was derived from research into the experience and science of facial disfiguration conducted with leading experts\n\nincluding interviews with women with severe facial disfigurements, cosmetic plastic surgeons and transplant teams. The\n\ninteractive element of the installation involved innovative facial modelling using specially developed software. The project\n\ninvolved technical research into the creation of a real-time interactive avatar and technical support from UCL, with some advice\n\nfrom University of Surrey.\n\nFirst seen in the context of a publicly sited art/science exhibition and especially created for BA Festival of Science 2006, the\n\nCover Story installation offers new and accessible ways of thinking about face transplants, a contentious issue in medical\n\nscience. The project has been presented in different forms: a gallery installation (Norwich, 2006, three artist show -\n\ncommissioned alongside Keith Piper and Simon Tegala with grant from Wellcome Trust), a forthcoming exhibition at\n\nFotofestival, Zaragoza, Spain, (2008); a conference presentation (University of Toronto, 2007). The project has led to ongoing\n\ncollaboration with Royal Free Plastic Surgery Unit to document a patient’s experience of a face transplant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score0.238

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8330.477

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWestminsterResearch (University of Westminster)Same topicOrgan and Tissue Transplantation ResearchFrench-language works237,207