MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6986149991

Ont. Economic report shows dampened outlook, Roundup on Canadian politics, Booster clinics for employees, Beijing Olympics is underway, Bulldogs aim to keep perfect record & The Chicken wing debate: Drums or Flats?

2022· other· en· W6986149991 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew) · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt Education and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBooster (rocketry)BeijingParliamentWrightMorningLake district
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Good Morning Hamilton Podcast w/ Rick Zamperin:The Ontario Chamber of Commerce's sixth annual Economic Report shows a 'dampered' outlook.GUEST: Rocco Rossi, President & CEO, Ontario Chamber of Commerce-As the federal Tories continue to mull over who their future leader is going to be, the Trudeau Liberals are figuring out a way to deal with the trucking protest on Parliament Hill.GUEST: Kim Wright, Principal and founder, Wright Strategies-Lou's Kitchen in Stoney Creek held a booster clinic for employees, friends and family - with the help of a roller derby playing nurse.GUEST: Angela Armbrister, nurse & roller derby player who administer booster shots at Lou's-The Beijing Winter Olympics are officially underway.GUEST: Les Carpenter, Sportswriter, Washington Post, in Beijing, China-The Hamilton Bulldogs aim to keep their perfect record in 2022 alive when they host Mississauga on Saturday and Peterborough on Sunday.GUEST: Reed Duthie, Play-by-Play Announcer, Hamilton Bulldogs-As the L.A. Rams and Cincinnati Bengals get ready to tangle in Super Bowl LVI on Feb. 13, the Good Morning Hamilton team wants to end the debate. When it comes to chicken wings, which is better, drums or flats?Rick offers his take and takes calls

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.643
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5900.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)Same topicArt Education and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207