Open Endings: Recent Gray Whale Strandings and their Cultural Representations in the Pacific Northwest
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Whale strandings and mass whale strandings have captured human imaginations for millennia. My focus is on the 1999-2000 eastern North Pacific gray whale ‘unusual mortality event’ (UME), when 651 whales were found stranded in Mexico, the USA and Canada. This event sheds light on the historical and contemporary impacts of nineteenth and early twentieth-century commercial whaling, its physical effects on the species, and the cultural representation of gray whales in lay communities. I reflect on the shifting status of these animals as they experienced near-extinction, relative population recovery, and ongoing vulnerability to anthropogenic activity. Whale strandings trigger different responses shaped by science and religion, extinction and conservation, and the intertwined histories of whaling and colonialism. I focus here on two gray whale deaths in the Pacific Northwest and their cultural ‘afterlives’ during the UME period. The first whale stranded on Whidbey Island, Puget Sound, and its skeleton was subsequently salvaged for educational purposes. The second was found entangled in fishing nets in Clayoquot Sound, Vancouver Island, whereupon it was harvested it for consumption according to the traditional whaling customs of the Ahousaht First Nations people in a powerful enactment of community revival. This thesis is interdisciplinary, reflecting the complexity of gray whales and their significance in diverse human cultures. Grounded in the blue humanities, the thesis draws on marine environmental history, animal studies and environmental sciences to show how gray whale deaths provide rich insights into the species and its ecosystem while revealing different human communities’ changing relationship to whales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".