Parasitosis intestinal en estudiantes del nivel primario de Huancayo al 2014
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the level of child intestinal parasitism according to the origin area in primary level students from El Tambo, Huancayo. Methods: A correlational descriptive research. For data collection about parasitism, a serial parasitological examination of stools (EPSD) and the Graham test with observation of three different samples per student were used, corresponding to first, second and third grades primary students. For data collection concerning to the academic performance, fourth quarter teachers’ reports were employed; corresponding to first, second and third grade of primary school students during 2013 in educational institutions, 31509 Ricardo Menéndez Menéndez and 30219 Paccha, El Tambo district, Huancayo. Results: It was observed students who present pathogenic parasites at 46,20% from rural areas and 38,6% from urban areas. After the process of hypothesis testing, it was observed that there were no significant differences in relation to parasitism according to where they are from (Pearson chi-square = 0,634 GL = 1 P value = 0,426). The chi square test was used, significance at 0,05 and 95% of statistical confidence. Conclusions: There is no significant difference between the parasitism levels according to the origin area.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".