MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6986348612

PENGARUH LOCUS OF CONTROL TERHADAP QUARTER LIFE CRISIS DEWASA AWAL

2023· dissertation· en· W6986348612 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUMM Institutional Repository (University of Maine at Machias) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicIdentity, Memory, and Therapy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLocus of controlQuarter (Canadian coin)Accidental samplingAccidentalLocus (genetics)Control (management)Young adult
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Emerging adulthood is a developmental phase that arises due to the transition from late adolescence to early adulthood. In this phase, individuals commonly experience a quarter life crisis, which is a crisis experienced by some individuals entering the early adulthood phase. Whether an individual is successful or not through the crisis they are experiencing is influenced by internal factors such as perception. How a person perceives events that occur is called locus of control. The aim of this research is to determine the influence of locus of control on quarter life crisis in early adulthood. This research uses a correlational quantitative approach with research subjects aged 18-28 years. The sampling technique used accidental sampling and the data analysis technique used was multiple linear regression. The results of the research show that there is an influence of locus of control on the quarter life crisis (p = 0.000 < 0.05), where internal locus of control is negatively related to the quarter life crisis and external locus of control is positively related to the quarter life crisis. The implication of this research is that it is hoped that it can help individuals who are in the early adulthood phase who are still going through the quarter life crisis phase to open their horizons by seeing difficulties as something that can be faced and overcome by having a tendency towards an internal locus of control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.710
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUMM Institutional Repository (University of Maine at Machias)Same topicIdentity, Memory, and TherapyFrench-language works237,207