MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6986367599

Phytoremediation of Soil containing
\nMixed Contaminants

2012· dissertation· en· W6986367599 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University) · 2012
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactants
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConcordia University
KeywordsPhytoremediationEDDSSoil contaminationContaminationLeaching (pedology)ChelationPulmonary surfactantSoil water
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phytoremediation of Soil containing Mixed Contaminants \n \nRamin Memarian, Ph.D. \nConcordia University, 2012 \n \nThis study investigated the application of surfactants and chelates to enhance the removal of mixed contaminants [Cd (II), Pb (II) and used engine oil] from a sandy soil cultivated with Indian mustard plants. For chelate additives, EDTA (Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid) was found to be more efficient than EDDS (Ethylenediamine disuccinic acid) in increasing the accumulation of metal contaminants Pb (II) in the plants. EDTA was also more capable of removing the used engine oil through rhizodegradation than EDDS. EDTA caused a sharper decrease in basal soil respiration (BSR) than EDDS, indicating that the former was much more toxic to the microbes. \nFor surfactant additives, the results showed that Triton X-100 and Tween 80 at concentrations higher than their critical micellar concentration enhanced phytostabilization of Pb (II). The application of Tween 80 resulted in an increase in phytoremediation of Pb (II). At the same concentrations, Tween 80 was more effective than Triton X-100 in facilitating rhizodegradation of the used engine oil. Soil basal microbiological respiration tests showed that the application of Tween 80 resulted in an increase in BSR. These tests indicated that the lower concentration of Triton X-100 had a slightly positive effect on BSR, whereas at higher concentrations, it was inhibitory to the microbes. \nEmpirical phytoremediation models linked to the removal of the heavy metals from the soil were formulated in the study. The two first order kinetic models were able to describe the leaching process for both Cd (II) and Pb (II). The models also revealed that the uptake of Pb (II) and Cd (II) were well described by the Freundlich type model, in the presence of surfactants. On the other hand, in the presence of chelates the uptake of Pb (II) and Cd (II) was found to follow the Langmuir type model. According to the leachability index (LI) determined in the tests, all surfactants tested can be considered as safe additives for enhancing phytoremediation. Compared to Triton X-100, Tween 80 resulted in lower diffusivity of metals tested and higher values of LI indicating that this surfactant was also safer from the point of view of reducing ground water pollution. Compared to EDTA, EDDS resulted in higher values of LI, which is desirable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)Same topicMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactantsFrench-language works237,207