MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6986386581

Područje znanosti u susretu s dječjim pitanjima

2009· article· hr· W6986386581 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueHrčak Portal of scientific journals of Croatia (University Computing Centre) · 2009
Typearticle
Languagehr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Science and Water Management
Canadian institutionsEducation and Early Childhood Development
Fundersnot available
Keywordsnot available
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Djeca u Europi 11Što zapravo znači kad odgajatelji doista počnu slušati dječja pitanja i teorije u području znanosti?Koji je cilj znanja -čiste znanstvene činjenice ili...? Mogu li dječje teorije te njihovo iskustveno znanje predstavljati put prema proširenom znanju o znanosti?Koje mogućnosti otvaraju 'slušanje' i 'relacijsko područje' u skladu s novim shvaćanjima u području znanosti?Spomenuta pitanja potekla su iz projekta provedenog u švedskom dječjem vrtiću u kojem je sudjelovalo dvadeset petogodišnjaka, od toga sedam djevojčica i trinaest dječaka.Projekt je započeo kad su djeca jednog proljeća u šumi pronašla uginulu srnu.Djeca su se grupno vraćala nekoliko puta vidjeti uginulu srnu sve dok, naposljetku, nisu ostali samo dijelovi kostura.Fascinirao ih je ovaj proces te su mnogo razgovarala o tome što se sve događalo raspadajućem tijelu.Vidjevši njihov interes, odgajatelji su odlučili da će kostur biti tema njihovog sljedećeg projekta te su zamolili djecu da za vrijeme ljetnih praznika sakupljaju kosture ili njihove fotografije.Rakovi i kosturi -empirijski primjer života i smrti... i ponovnog rođenja Kad su se nakon ljetnih praznika vratila u vrtić, djeca su donijela mnogo nalazaka: losove, srneće i ptičje lubanje, oklope rakova, rebra, kamenje s fosilima, zmijsku kožu, fotografiju labuđeg kostura i izgorjelog automobila.Ivar, koji je donio oklope, rekao je: 'Rakovi nemaju kostur u svome tijelu, jer je oklop njihov kostur.Oklopi moga raka su prazni jer mislim da su ptice pojele meso.Možete vidjeti gdje su im oči i zubi.Njihovi se zubi miču amotamo dok jedu.Vidio sam to.' Mnoga djeca su također donijela rakove.Proučavala su njihove oklope te istovremeno raspravljala o različitostima između rakova i njih samih.Imaju li rakovi doista samo kostur izvana a ništa iznutra, za razliku od ljudi?Odgajatelji primjećuju dječju zainteresiranost za rakove te odlučuju kupiti zamrznutog raka kojeg će moći pobliže istražiti.Istraživanje u malim grupama izazvalo je među djecom mnoge rasprave.Mirisala su i dodirivala rakove, izrađivala crteže i slike te razgovarala o životu rakova:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueHrčak Portal of scientific journals of Croatia (University Computing Centre)Same topicEnvironmental Science and Water ManagementFrench-language works237,207