MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6986414585

Physical properties of greenhouse container media

2023· article· en· W6986414585 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Collections of Colorado (Colorado State University) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicComposting and Vermicomposting Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAerationBulk densityPorosityGreenhouseVermiculiteSoil waterPeat
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Combinations of Canadian peat, vermiculite, perlite, Colorado peat, sand and soil were used to prepare 50 greenhouse container media. These media were placed in six-inch plastic pots in a greenhouse environment. Physical properties were determined on undisturbed core samples taken from these pots at 0, 30, 60 and 90 days after potting. There were no changes in bulk density or total porosity over a 90-day period and only slight changes in aeration porosity and available water. Aeration porosities of the media ranged from 18-54%, all values being above the 10-15% minimum recommended by most researchers. Fresh and dry weights of chrysanthemums grown in 10 widely varying media increased with increasing aeration porosity. Available water ranged from 16-57%. Media with a high percentage of Canadian peat, Colorado peat, or vermiculite held the greatest amounts of available water and those high in soil or sand held the least. Bulk densities ranged from 0.10-1.55 g/cc. If densities less than 1.0 g/cc are desired, less than 80% soil or 60% sand should be used. Total porosities ranged from 43-97% and were correlated with all other physical properties. Bulk density values can be used to predict the total porosity of media. Total porosity values may be used to approximate available water and give a general idea of aeration porosity. In general, soilless media possessed the most desirable physical properties. Media containing only soil and/or sand consistently had the least desirable properties. Adding sand to soil produces few, if any, physical improvements. Colorado peat appears satisfactory as a substitute for Canadian peat. Physical properties of Colorado peat are more desirable when mixed with perlite or vermiculite, rather than soil or sand. The threshold proportion concept did not apply to any of the physical properties for most of the media tested.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.351
Threshold uncertainty score0.323

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it