Per le fonti dell'Aldina dei Rhetores Graeci: il Vat. Pal. gr. 66
Bibliographic record
Abstract
When in 1992 Martin Sicherl presented a survey of the manuscript sources and preserved printer’s copies (Druckvorlagen) of the Aldine edition of the Rhetores Graeci (two volumes published in 1508 and 1509), the German scholar argued that the source of pp. 461-734 of the first volume of the Aldine edition was a now lost copy of the Vienna ms. Phil. gr. 60 (copied by Georgios Trivizias in the third quarter of the 15th century). Even though Sicherl’s conclusions have not hitherto been challenged, it is now possible to show that the original printer’s copy was in fact the ms. Vat. Pal. gr. 66, penned by the so called «Anonymus Harvardianus», a scribe well known for his contribution to the Aldine Aristotle. Following a thorough description of all the marks characterizing a manuscript involved in the printing process (i.e. lines indicating the end of a printed page, ink spots, fingerprints, etc.) this paper will discuss the textual relation between the Palatine manuscript and the text printed by Aldus. A new description of the manuscript concludes the study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".