Post translational activation of latent transforming growth factor beta (L-TGF-O): clinical implications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transforming growth factor-betas (TGF-Bs) \n\t\t\t\t are multifunctional cytokines that exist in 3 isoforms in \n\t\t\t\t mammals. The TGF-Bs are ubiquitously expressed and \n\t\t\t\t al1 isoforms are secreted as biologically inactive \n\t\t\t\t precursors called latent TGF-B (L-TGF- B). LTGF-Bs \n\t\t\t\t are generally not effective molecules because they are \n\t\t\t\t unable to interact with their receptors. However, the \n\t\t\t\t removal of or conformational change of the precursor \n\t\t\t\t protein called the latency associated peptide (LAP) \n\t\t\t\t results in the generation of biologically active TGF- B. Zn \n\t\t\t\t vitro active TGF-B has many biological effects but from \n\t\t\t\t a clinical point of view one of the most recognized \n\t\t\t\t associations of aberrant TGF-B production is with \n\t\t\t\t diseases characterized by enhanced connective tissue \n\t\t\t\t synthesis. Recently a number of observations in the \n\t\t\t\t context of fibrotic disorders suggest mechanisms of \n\t\t\t\t activation of L-TGF-61 in vivo. The recognition of \n\t\t\t\t mechanisms that activate L-TGF-81 in vivo offers the \n\t\t\t\t possibiiity of interfering with the activation of L-TGFB1 \n\t\t\t\t for therapeutic purposes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".