MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6986851646

Regulation of Gnrh mRNA Expression by the ω-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid Docosahexaenoic acid and the Saturated Fatty Acid Palmitate in a GnRH-synthesizing Neuronal Cell Model

2015· dissertation· en· W6986851646 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace (University of Toronto) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDocosahexaenoic acidPolyunsaturated fatty acidFatty acidMessenger RNASaturated fatty acidPalmitic acidReceptorHormone
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neurons coordinate reproduction. Whether GnRH neurons directly sense free fatty acids (FFAs) is unknown. We investigated the individual effects of the FFAs palmitate, palmitoleate, oleate, and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) (100 μM each) on Gnrh mRNA expression in the mHypoA-GnRH/GFP neuronal cell model. We report that 2 h exposure to palmitate or DHA increases Gnrh transcription. Using the inhibitors AH7614, K252c, U0126, wortmannin, and LY294002, we demonstrate that the effect of DHA is mediated through G protein-coupled receptor 120 to downstream PKC/MAPK and PI3K signaling. Moreover, we propose that the effect of palmitate may depend on palmitoyl-coA synthesis and PI3K signaling. Finally, we explored the effects of FFA combinations, and we report that oleate abolishes the effect of 2 h palmitate treatment on Gnrh. Overall, these studies advance our understanding of the cellular mechanisms underlying FFA sensing in a GnRH neuronal model and may relate to reproductive function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace (University of Toronto)Same topicHypothalamic control of reproductive hormonesFrench-language works237,207