MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6986855923

Rethinking legislative protection for youth with severe substance use disorders in Manitoba

2023· dissertation· en· W6986855923 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutonomyLegislatureObligationSubstance useInvoluntary treatmentDrug treatmentAddiction treatmentBest interests
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Manitoba Youth Drug Stabilization (Support for Parents) Act provides for a brief period of commitment of youth with severe substance use disorder. The Act is intended to stabilize the youth and develop a treatment plan which the youth can voluntarily initiate after stabilization. However, the nature of substance use disorders and resultant short term and long-term effects excludes some youth from the protection intended by the Youth Drug Stabilization (Support for Parents) Act. This is because even after compulsory stabilization, they lack cognitive capacity to process the information necessary to make autonomous treatment decisions or voluntarily follow through on treatment plans, due to the severity of their condition. This research paper argues that the Youth Drug Stabilization (Support for Parents) Act (YDSA) should be expanded to ensure involuntary treatment for youth, because of the effects of severe substance use disorders on their health and level of autonomous functioning. Involuntary treatment will provide the necessary medical care needed to restore their autonomy and other individual rights. The research paper acknowledges some risks that are associated with involuntary treatment and therefore proposes a responsive communitarian approach to balance the autonomy of youth and the obligation to protect them for the common good of society. The responsive communitarian approach provides a valuable framework for rethinking the current provisions of the Youth Drug Stabilization (Support for Parents) Act to better protect youth with severe substance use disorders. In conclusion the research paper will recommend new directions to providing involuntary treatment care, which focus on the best interest of the youth. This includes thorough capacity assessment processes during the period of stabilization to establish the youth’s history as well as adequate acknowledgement of the consequences and risks that may occur if treatment is not received.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.304
Threshold uncertainty score0.611

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0040.006
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes→French-language works237,207→