MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6986937203

Review of <i>The Indian Association of Alberta: A History ofPolitical Action</i> By Laurie Meijer Drees

2003· article· en· W6986937203 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueLincoln (University of Nebraska) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsMainstreamGovernment (linguistics)PaternalismAssociation (psychology)Welfare
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Native political organizations occupy a unique and important place in the Canadian political arena, whether on the national, provincial, or regional level. They offer a forum where both Native leaders and mainstream politicians can confer and, perhaps even more importantly, be seen to be conferring. This book is a study of one of the most influential of these organizations, the Indian Association of Alberta (IAA), from its beginning in 1939 as an organization devoted to regional and com~ unity issues to the 1960s, when it led the fight against the Trudeau government's "White Paper." One of the volume's strengths is the special effort Meijer Drees has made to locate the development of the IAA in the political milieu of the 1930s and 1940s. She masterfully demonstrates how different provincial political parties, government acts, the development of farmers' unions, and other social political and economic factors contributed to the IAA's founding and growth. She also illustrates how current thought in the 1940s regarding social welfare programs was translated into Indian policy. Along the way she challenges many commonly-held preconceptions about early influences on the organization, such as the supposed impact of Native World War II veterans. Perhaps one of the most enlightening aspects of her study involves the role non-Natives played in the IAA's development. Drees pays particular attention to John Laurie, IAA secretary from 1944 to 1956. Through the IAA, Laurie was able to promote his personal view of what would benefit Indian peoples. His paternalistic and integrationist ideas played counterpoint to the ideas and interests of the organization's Native leaders. Along with discussing the effects of white liberal organizations such as the Friends of the Indian Society and the Indian Rights Association, Drees offers important and perceptive analyses of the motivations and political thought of Native leaders like John Calihoo, John T ootoosis, Harold Cardinal, and others.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score0.361

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0100.030
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLincoln (University of Nebraska)Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207