Sample Size Formulas For Estimating Areas Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves With Precision and Assurance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is commonly used to quantify the discriminative ability of tests with ordinal or continuous test data. When planning a study to evaluate a new test, it is important to determine a minimum sample size required to achieve a prespecified precision of estimating AUC. However, conventional sample size formulas do not consider the probability of achieving a prespecified precision, resulting in underestimation of sample sizes. To incorporate the assurance probability, asymptotic sample size formulas were derived using different variance estimators for AUC in this thesis. The precision of AUC estimations was quantified by either lower confidence limits or interval width. The performance of proposed sample size formulas was evaluated through simulation studies. Simulation results show that the formula based on lower limits with the nonparametric method performs best and can be used with both ordinal and continuous data. The methods are illustrated with examples from previously published data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".