MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6987036256

Rodman Hall Art Centre fonds, 1958-2019, n.d.

2023· other· en· W6987036256 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University) · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBrock University
KeywordsBrotherMemphisThrivingBallroomWightThe artsMilePlot (graphics)Context (archaeology)DowntownArchitecture
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rodman Hall was built Thomas Rodman Merritt (1824-1906), the youngest son of William Hamilton Merritt and Catherine Prendergast. Merritt married Mary Benson in 1853. He built a grand home in St. Catharines on an extensive plot of land. Construction began around 1857 and was completed in 1863. The house became known as Rodman Hall and is located close to the junction of Twelve Mile Creek and the Second Welland Canal. Initially, the property was designed as a large garden that resembled a park. By 1852, the landscaped grounds were completed. Remnants of the garden remain today, thriving in the sheltered climate of the Twelve Mile Creek valley. In the first phase of the home's construction from 1857 to 1860, the original or west wing was built. When Merritt's older brother William Hamilton Merritt Jr. died in 1860, building materials intended for construction of a house in Montebello Park were sent to Rodman Hall to be used. That same year construction on the east wing began, which was completed in 1863. Other minor renovations were made over the years, including the addition of dormer windows and installation of stained-glass windows on the central staircase. The house remained in the Merritt family until 1959 when it was purchased by the St. Catharines and District Arts Council. Peter Harris served as the curator and director for many years. The Council established a public art centre at Rodman Hall after a fundraising campaign to purchase and renovate the house. A new gallery was added that adjoined the former drawing room. It was used as a music studio as well as for art exhibition. Rodman Hall became the centre for visual arts in the Niagara Peninsula. Exhibitions by local artists were held, as well as retrospective shows of James Morrice, David Milne and Emily Carr. A display of artwork by children from local public schools became an annual event. The visual arts program was supplemented by Sunday concerts, children’s theatre and evening film and lecture series. As the programs and services expanded, the facilities at Rodman Hall became increasingly inadequate. Further renovations were undertaken in 1974 after National Museums of Canada announced that Rodman Hall had been selected as a National Exhibition Centre. The expanded art centre was designed primarily as an art gallery as opposed to a facility for the performing arts, as Rodman Hall was not able to accommodate the needs of many performing arts groups. Accordingly, there was less need for an Arts Council and the name of the administering organization was changed from the St. Catharines and District Arts Council to Rodman Hall Art Centre. Brock University acquired Rodman Hall in 2003 and continued to use it as an art gallery. During this time, the quality of the programming and publications were acknowledged nationally and provincially with several awards. The Department of Visual Arts also had a strong relationship with Rodman Hall. Students had the opportunity to use the studio space and participate in an annual graduate show curated by faculty and staff. In 2020, the university reached an agreement with community partners that saw the art collection return to community ownership and the property redeveloped by a local group known for heritage building restoration and redevelopment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.634
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6340.238

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University)→French-language works237,207→