MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6987284897

Souvenirs of Venice: Reproduced views, tourism, and city spaces

2016· dissertation· en· W6987284897 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)Field (mathematics)Space (punctuation)Work (physics)Agency (philosophy)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation is the first study of the three-hundred year history of souvenir images of Venice produced by local Venetians for tourists from the eighteenth century to the twenty-first century.The project traces both the changes and the elements of continuity in the Venetian spaces depicted and in the visual conventions used.The Introduction explains why Venice is a particularly significant subject for a study of souvenir imagery and outlines the theoretical ideas related to travel and souvenirs that inform the work that follows.Chapter One focuses on the view paintings of Venice by Giovanni Canaletto and Francesco Guardi, as well as Antonio Visentini's engravings of Canaletto's paintings, within the context of both the Grand Tour and Venice's dwindling power leading up to the fall of the Republic in 1797.Chapter Two explores nineteenth-century photographs of Venice made by local photographers Carlo Ponti, Carlo Naya, and Tomaso Filippi, with the photographs organized into central and peripheral spaces in the city, and with attention devoted to archival material in the little-known Archivio Filippi.Chapter Three considers the photographs in their serial form, as images included in commercial souvenir albums.Chapter Four analyzes twentieth-century postcards of Venice, which used the nineteenth-century photographs for their images.The Conclusion includes a study of a company in Venice that is continuing the tradition of producing postcard views of the city for visitors.The chapters also call attention to how the figures of locals and foreigners are presented in the images; to the tourist circuits through Venice implied in collections of images bound together, which are read here as visual guidebooks; and to spaces that brought tourists together to engage with the city's souvenir images, specifically Joseph Smith's viewing gallery on the Grand Canal in the eighteenth century, photographers' shops in San Marco in the nineteenth century, and the post office at the Fondaco dei Tedeschi in the early twentieth century.Souvenirs of Venice

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicHistorical Art and Culture Studies→French-language works237,207→