Special Session Publishing in CJAS: Meet the Editors/Publier dans La RCÉA: Rencontre avec l'équipe éditoriale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Special Session\nPublishing in CJAS: Meet the Editors\nCanadian Journal of African Studies (CJAS) is the official publication of the Canadian Association of African Studies (CAAS). Launched in 1967, it is a bilingual multidisciplinary journal that aims to enrich knowledge of Africa by publishing rigorous scholarship about the continent and its individual countries. In doing so, it seeks to inform policy on and in Africa and to generate interest in the study and understanding of Africa worldwide. See more at https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rcas20/current\nCJAS is edited by a team of seven editors and a book review editor. In this panel, editors will share information and advice from their experience as members of the editorial team. They will provide a behind-the-scenes look at the peer review and editorial decision process and offer guidance about what makes a publishable scholarly article – and what pitfalls to avoid. There will also be opportunity to discuss writing book reviews and proposing special issues. The session will be informal and based largely on questions from the audience rather than formal presentations.\nPanelists (TBC):\nBelinda Dodson (Western University),\nMartin Evans (Coventry University),\nPhilippe Frowd (University of Ottawa),\nGillian Mathys (Ghent University),\nJean Ntakirutimana (Brock University),\nVanessa Dos Santos Oliveira (Royal Military College),\nJonathan Roberts (Mount Saint Vincent University)\nPublier dans La RCÉA: Rencontre avec l’équipe éditoriale\nLa Revue canadienne des études africaines (RCÉA) est le périodique officiel de l'Association canadienne des études africaines (ACÉA). Créée en 1967, cette revue multidisciplinaire bilingue s’est engagée à développer une meilleure connaissance de l’Afrique en publiant des études rigoureuses sur le continent et sur ses pays spécifiques. Ce faisant, La RCÉA cherche à éclairer les politiques sur et en Afrique et à susciter l'intérêt pour l'étude et la compréhension de l'Afrique à travers le monde. Pour en savoir plus, veuillez visiter https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rcas20/current\nL'équipe éditoriale de La RCÉA comprend sept rédactrices/rédacteurs ainsi qu’un rédacteur des comptes rendus de livres. Dans ce panel, les rédactrices/rédacteurs partageront des informations et des conseils issus de leurs expériences en tant que membres de l'équipe éditoriale. Elles/Ils fourniront un aperçu en coulisses des processus d’évaluation par les pairs et de décision éditoriale, elles/ils offriront aussi des indications sur ce qui rend publiable un article de recherche– ainsi que les pièges à éviter. Il sera également possible de discuter de la rédaction des comptes rendus de livres et de comment proposer des numéros spéciaux. La session sera informelle et basée en grande partie sur les questions de l’audience, plutôt que sur des présentations formelles.\nPanélistes (à confirmer): Belinda Dodson (Western University), Martin Evans (Coventry University), Philippe Frowd (University of Ottawa), Gillian Mathys (Ghent University), Jean Ntakirutimana (Brock University), Vanessa Dos Santos Oliveira (Royal Military College), Jonathan Roberts (Université Mount Saint Vincent)\n*Please note this session will be recorded and posted on this page after the conference.\nMeeting ID: 921 8023 8171
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".