MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6987363434

Statistics in Focus: Population and social conditions. Labour Market Latest Trends 1st quarter 2005 data 63.2% of the working age population in employment. 2005.16

2005· other· en· W6987363434 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueKETlib (University of Piraeus) · 2005
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorking populationQuarter (Canadian coin)UnemploymentPopulationUnemployment ratePopulation statisticsWorking ageOfficial statisticsWorking time
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Labour Market Latest Trends 1st quarter 2005 data 63.2% of the working age population in employmentThis publication belongs to a quarterly series presenting the European Union Labour Force Survey main results for the EU-25 and for all Member States 1 . Part-time jobs and temporary contracts stimulate the employment in the EUIn the first quarter 2005, 63.2% of the working age population (15-64 years of age) held a job or other business activity in the EU-25, compared to 62.6% one year before.Among member states, Spain (from 60.3% to 62.1%) and Slovenia (from 63.8% to 65.2%) recorded the highest increases 2 .The gender gap in employment continues to narrow: while the male employment rate increased by 0.4 percentage points from 70.2% in the 1 st quarter 2004 to 70.6% in the first quarter 2005, the female employment rate rose by 0.7 points in a year, to reach 55.8% of women aged 15 to 64 years.As a result of the rise in the employment rate, the share of the active population (employed plus unemployed people) in the whole population aged 15-64 increased, to reach 69.8% in the 1st quarter 2005, compared to 69.4% one year before.The female unemployment rate decreased by 0.5 percentage points while the male unemployment rate decreased by 0.2 points in this period 3 .However, the long-term unemployment rate, which measures the share of the people unemployed for one year and more in the active population, remained almost unchanged (0.2 point decline for women and 0.1 point decline for men).In the EU-25, the share of part-time employment in total employment increased between the first quarter of 2004 and the first quarter of 2005.For men, it grew by 0.6 point to 7.5%, while it rose by 1.0 point to 32.6% for women.The share of temporary contracts also increased.Chart 1: Changes in some labour market indicators of the EU-25 from 2004Q1 to 2005Q1 (percentage point) -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 Changes in activity rate (15-64) Changes in employment rate (15-64) Changes in share of part-time employment (15+) Changes in share of temporary contracts (15+) Changes in unemployment rate (15-64) Changes in longterm unemp.rate (15-64) Men Women Source: Eurostat, LFS 1 In this publication, as in the previous ones, the data have not been adjusted for seasonal variation, due to the short time series available.Therefore data have to be compared from one quarter to the same quarter one year before.2 Quarterly data are not yet available for Luxembourg.From 2005Q1, German data come from a continuous labour force survey while for the previous years they are derived from estimates based on a survey which took place every year in March.So German data and European aggregates for 2005 are not fully comparable with previous years.3 The unemployment rate calculated in this paper is directly derived from the Labour Force Survey data.The adjusted unemployment series (15+) published on a monthly basis by Eurostat can slightly differ from these results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.010
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0620.043

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKETlib (University of Piraeus)French-language works237,207