Studio "Salute degli anziani del territorio" – (SAT), efficacia dell'attivita fisica adattata (APA – salute in movimento), nel miglioramento delle performance motorie e delle competenze cognitive in risposta alla cronicita
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CAMPIONE DELLO STUDIO Nella fig.1, la flow chart con i dati dei soggetti reclutati.CRITERI PER L'ARRUOLAMENTO Valutazione clinica da parte del medico per verificare l'idoneit a svolgere l'attivit fisica prevista e la somministrazione del Modified Baecke Questionaire for Older Adults (MBQOA) per valutare l'attivit fisica svolta negli ultimi 12 mesi.INDICATORI DI RISULTATO Al tempo 0 e dopo 6 mesi: Walking Test (WT6min), Time Up and Go test (TUG), Timed Up and Go + Dual Task (al TUG Test, viene chiesta la ripetizione dei giorni della settimana in sequenza in ordine inverso). stato inoltre valutato il dolore, mediante la Scala Analogica Visiva (VAS).Il test MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assestment), stato utilizzato per valutare lo stato cognitivo.La mobilit articolare del cingolo scapolo omerale misurata in gradi mediante un goniometro fisiatrico, la riduzione della circonferenza addominale e l'aderenza al programma APA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".