MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6987667393

The trade question. Fallacies of protection, or the so-called "national policy".

2014· article· en· W6987667393 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEducational Reforms and Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRevenueProtectionismGreat DepressionDepression (economics)Tax revenueLiberian dollarNatural (archaeology)Goods and services
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Whenever distress from any cause whatsoever has begun to make itself felt by any considerable class in the community, there is no lack of charlatans ready to persuade the people that they possess some infallible remedy, warranted to cure all the ills that flesh is heir to ; and most assuredly the Protectionist champions of the present day are in nowise behind in proclaiming the universal efficacy of their particular nostrum.What is our Complaint, and what are their Remedies ?Canada, like almost every civilized country in the earth, is laboring just now under temporary depression : that is to srj, her people are poorer than they used to be, -or, at any rate, than they imagined themselves to be ; and by way of remedy it is solemnly proposed to add TEN OR TWELVE MILLION DOLLARS PER ANNUM TO THEIR PRESENT TAXATION !Canada obtains the greater part of her revenue from duties on imports, and she is more or less in financial difficulty because the quantity of these imports has been largely diminished.For remedy, we are told, Let us abolish ail imports or by far the largest portion, and thereby improve our revenue by throwing away two-thirds of it !Then, Canada has expended enormous sums of money in cheapening the transport of goods from one side of the Atlantic to the other ; and she receives but small direct returns for the cost of most of these works.Therefore, the natural remedy, by way of improving matters, is to in- flict a heavy penalty on all persons proposing to bring any return cargoes to this country !Canada possesses extraordinary advantages for certain special pur- suits, more particularly for the production of grain, of cattle, of agri- cultural products generally ; aud she is, by virtue of her position, debarred to a great extent from competing on equal terms in a good many manufactures.Therefore, by way of remedy for existing evils, her people are exhorted to abandon these naturally profitable occupations, and to betake themselves to those branchee of industry in which the odds are from natural causes heavily against them I Lastly, Canada enjoys a reasonably fair and equitable system el taxation, pressing evenly on the whole of the community, and not designed to give any unjust advantage to one class above another.Therefore, let us by all means abolish this system, and intreduoe mod&s ef taxation which will compel every merchant and every manufacturer in the kind to make up his mind that the only sure read to prosperity is TO secure sufficient political influence to have the tariff ARRANGED FOR HIS PARTICULAR BENEFIT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.576

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it