MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6987895835

Understanding non-agricultural entrepreneurial activities developed by farmers in Canada

2008· dissertation· en· W6987895835 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2008
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPromotion (chess)EntrepreneurshipLocus of controlEmpirical evidenceEmpirical researchAgricultureControl (management)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The promotion of entrepreneurial activities is considered a mean to boost employment and income opportunities in less favoured areas. Farmers, as experienced owners and managers of productive resources, represent a great entrepreneurial potential for developing non-agricultural businesses. The aim of this study is to provide empirical evidence regarding farmers' entrepreneurial characteristics, factors affecting their decisions to participate in non-agricultural entrepreneurial activities, and a characterization of the process of formation and operation of farm-based value-added activities in Canada. Canadian farmers exhibit internal locus of control (LOC) and moderate high levels of entrepreneurial self-efficacy (ESE) and entrepreneurial alertness (EA). Farmers performing non-agricultural entrepreneurial activities show higher levels of ESE and EA than farmers who are not doing these types of activities. Furthermore, farmers' participation in value-added activities is influenced positively by innovation, university education, participation in organizations and production of fruit and vegetables. Farming experience affects negatively. Participation in non-farm business is positively influenced by managerial abilities, business experience, and participation in off-farm employment. Negative factors are university education and fruit and vegetable production. In respect to characteristics of farm-based value-added activities: the main objectives for starting VAD are to complement household income and to assure survival of family businesses; main problems in starting VAD are lack of marketing skills and managerial abilities and meeting regulations; and the main barriers for not participation in VAD are lack of time, financial constraints and size of operation. VAD are mostly family businesses involved in direct selling through farmers' markets, pick-your-own and farm shops with a local customer base. The main contribution of VAD activities to farm household are achievement of initial objectives and increase in household income. The results suggest that farmers have the entrepreneurial potential for participating in strategies of rural development through business diversification. Better institutional coordination, revision of regulations and appropriate incentives can improve their participation. Policymakers and rural developers can benefit from this information in developing policies involving farmers in creating or expanding entrepreneurial activities in rural areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)→Same topicEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences→French-language works237,207→