MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6988136445

Women, War, and the Birth of Bangladesh

2023· dissertation· en· W6988136445 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicBangladesh Politics, Society, and Development
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeAgency (philosophy)Raw dataBengaliContext (archaeology)Theme (computing)Government (linguistics)PoliticsInterpretation (philosophy)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

My thesis explores the impact of women revolutionaries during the 1971 Liberation War of Bangladesh: it investigates the reasons that thrust Bengali women into political activism: Why did they take up arms, or provide protection to the Bengali revolutionaries in their struggle against the Pakistani military junta?The role of women freedom fighters in the history of Bangladesh's liberation is an understudied theme compared to the role of their male compatriots.This dissertation seeks to restore agency to women in the nation's fight for freedom.Methodologically, my research interrogates two major components of primary sources: archival documents on the 1971 liberation war, and interviews of contemporaneous observers and/or their descendants.I complement this through a study of 1971 war-related printed Bengali novels, local histories, periodicals, and diaries.I tapped into published Bangladesh government data as secondary sources, as well as new documentaries, videos, and photographs.Due to this project's aim of understanding the women freedom fighters' own perspectives and truths, I applied principles of emergent design in data collection and analysis.My data analysis followed a combination of inductive content analysis and narrative analysis.The inductive approach condenses raw textual data into brief summaries, to establish clear links between the research objectives and the summary findings derived from the raw data, and to develop a framework of the underlying structure of experiences that are evident in the raw data.The narrative analysis focuses on my interpretation of stories or experiences shared by interviewees within the social context of the research project.P a g e | 6 Rsum Ma thse explore l'impact des femmes rvolutionnaires pendant la guerre de libration du Bangladesh en 1971 : elle examine les raisons qui ont pouss les femmes Bengalis poursuivre l'activisme politique : pourquoi ont-elles pris les armes, ou ont fourni une protection aux rvolutionnaires Bengalis dans leur lutte contre la junte militaire pakistanaise ?Le rle des femmes rvolutionnaires de la libert dans l'histoire de la libration du Bangladesh est un thme peu tudi par rapport au rle de leurs compatriotes masculins.Cette thse vise redonner aux femmes le pouvoir d'agir dans la lutte nationale pour la libert.Mthodologiquement, ma recherche interroge deux composantes majeures des sources primaires: des documents d'archives sur la guerre de libration de 1971, et des entretiens d'observateurs contemporains et/ou de leurs descendants.Je complte cela par une tude de romans Bengalis imprims lis la guerre de 1971, de priodiques d'histoires locales et de journaux intimes.J'ai aussi recherch dans les donnes publies par le gouvernement du Bangladesh en tant que sources secondaires, ainsi que dans de nouveaux documentaires, vidos et photographies.L'objectif de ce project c'est comprendre les propres perspectives et vrits des femmes combattantes pour la libert, afin de cela j'ai appliqu les principes de la conception mergente dans la collecte et l'analyse des donnes.Mon analyse de donnes a suivi une combinaison d'analyse de contenu inductive et d'analyse narrative.L'approche inductive condense les donnes textuelles brutes en brefs rsums, pour tablir des liens clairs entre les objectifs de la recherche et les rsultats sommaires drivs des donnes brutes, pendant aussi dveloppant un cadre de la structure sous-jacente des expriences qui sont videntes dans les donnes brutes.L'analyse narrative se concentre sur mon interprtation des histoires ou des expriences partages par les personnes interroges dans le contexte social du projet de recherche.P a g e | 7 P a g e | 8 AcknowledgementMy first and greatest debt is to my supervisor, Professor Subho Basu.I am deeply

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.526
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicBangladesh Politics, Society, and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207