MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6988195179

“What the hell’s happening to me”: A qualitative study of diet, exercise, and self-compassion in retiring student-athletes.

2023· article· en· W6988195179 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSport Psychology and Performance
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAthletesInterpretative phenomenological analysisQualitative researchReflexivityIdentity (music)Identification (biology)Scale (ratio)Adult developmentLived experience
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Athletic retirement is a significant life transition with potentially deleterious effects on former athletes’ social, mental, and physical health. Individuals with high athletic identification are particularly susceptible to unhealthy eating and exercise behaviors, yet self-compassion may guide more adaptive transitions by supporting positive identity adaptation and healthier eating and exercise behaviors. The purpose of this study was to explore how student-athletes experience retirement, specifically their navigation of personal diet and exercise routines post-sport, and how self-compassion may shape this process. Seven collegiate athletes of high athletic identification completed one semi-structured interview two months following the end of their athletic careers. Interview questions developed from Taylor and Olgivie’s 1994 athletic retirement model and Neff’s 2003 self-compassion scale probed athletes’ diet, exercise, and self-compassion practices. Interpretative phenomenological analysis, bolstered by reflexive journaling and critical friend consultation, identified individual themes before considering themes across participants. Results indicated athletes largely accepted retirement, although often extended their transition from sport by resisting change. Mixed self-compassion tendencies and volatile exercise motivation were seen within and between participants, and a heightened and uncomfortable sensitivity to eating habits and bodily changes was consistent among athletes. This study contributes to a larger three-part study considering eating, exercise, and self-compassion throughout athletic retirement, supplementing scarce longitudinal research into athletic retirement, and pioneering self-compassion in retirement literature. Significantly, this study provides rare real-time insight into retiring athletes’ thoughts, feelings, and behaviors at an acute retirement phase, suggesting athletes may benefit from greater guidance as they enter a foreign life outside sport.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0160.014
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0030.007
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSport Psychology and Performance→French-language works237,207→