Дослідження готовності педагогів інклюзивних закладів до Роботи з дітьми зі складними порушеннями розвитку
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article highlights the problem of the readiness of teachers of general secondary education institutions with inclusive education to work with children with complex developmental disorders. The research included three stages: preparatory, diagnostic, analytical. The main research method was a questionnaire. 30 teachers of general secondary education institutions with inclusive education took part in the ascertainment experiment. The results of the study showed that almost half of the interviewed teachers have a positive attitude towards the implementation of inclusive education. Most respondents believe that children with complex developmental disabilities are not eligible for inclusive education. About half of the respondents have relatively correct ideas about complex developmental disorders. Only a quarter of the respondents answered that all teams of psychological and pedagogical support for children with special educational needs take part in drawing up an individual development program. Teachers have partial ideas about adaptations and modifications, they do not know how to implement them in their work. Educators indicated the factors that prevent the quality implementation of inclusive education in the institution of general secondary education. Most of the interviewees indicated the expediency of training teachers to work in inclusive classes with the help of various forms of scientific and methodological work. The analysis of the results of the questionnaire indicates a significant deficit of the competencies of pedagogical workers in the field of inclusive education of children with complex developmental disorders. A promising direction of research is the development of measures, the implementation of which will contribute to the formation of the inclusive competence of teachers, and the writing of methodological recommendations for teachers on working with children with complex developmental disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.077 | 0.029 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".