MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6988240444

Дослідження готовності педагогів інклюзивних закладів до Роботи з дітьми зі складними порушеннями розвитку

2025· other· en· W6988240444 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific periodicals of Ukraine · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompetence (human resources)InstitutionSpecial educationEducational institutionQuarter (Canadian coin)Inclusion (mineral)Work (physics)Quality (philosophy)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article highlights the problem of the readiness of teachers of general secondary education institutions with inclusive education to work with children with complex developmental disorders. The research included three stages: preparatory, diagnostic, analytical. The main research method was a questionnaire. 30 teachers of general secondary education institutions with inclusive education took part in the ascertainment experiment. The results of the study showed that almost half of the interviewed teachers have a positive attitude towards the implementation of inclusive education. Most respondents believe that children with complex developmental disabilities are not eligible for inclusive education. About half of the respondents have relatively correct ideas about complex developmental disorders. Only a quarter of the respondents answered that all teams of psychological and pedagogical support for children with special educational needs take part in drawing up an individual development program. Teachers have partial ideas about adaptations and modifications, they do not know how to implement them in their work. Educators indicated the factors that prevent the quality implementation of inclusive education in the institution of general secondary education. Most of the interviewees indicated the expediency of training teachers to work in inclusive classes with the help of various forms of scientific and methodological work. The analysis of the results of the questionnaire indicates a significant deficit of the competencies of pedagogical workers in the field of inclusive education of children with complex developmental disorders. A promising direction of research is the development of measures, the implementation of which will contribute to the formation of the inclusive competence of teachers, and the writing of methodological recommendations for teachers on working with children with complex developmental disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific periodicals of UkraineFrench-language works237,207