MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6988683925

全球二恶英大气网格化排放清单的建立及验证

2019· other· zh· W6988683925 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLanzhou University Institutional Repository · 2019
Typeother
Languagezh
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicToxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)Natural (archaeology)Identification (biology)Process (computing)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

二恶英是世界上毒性最大的持久性有机污染物之一,它们可以沿食物网富集放大,对人类健康造成严重危害。建立二恶英排放清单是制定减排战略的关键步骤,也是模拟研究二恶英环境行为和健康风险评估的基础数据。本研究首先基于斯德哥尔摩公约中已发布66个国家二恶英排放量,结合主成分分析法确定影响二恶英排放的主要经济活动因子,构建二恶英排放回归模型;然后基于此模型,估算全球196个国家2002-2012年的二恶英大气排放量,并基于人口密度构建全球网格化二恶英大气排放清单(1°×1°);利用CanMETOP(Canadian Model for Environmental Transport of Organochlorine Pesticides)模拟二恶英环境归趋行为过程及在各环境介质中的浓度水平。并将模拟的大气浓度与实际观测数据进行比较,以验证排放清单。结果表明,2002-2012年期间,全球二恶英的排放量呈现下降趋势。从空间上看,二恶英排放主要集中在亚洲、非洲和欧洲,其中2012年排放量前五位的是中国(3120 g TEQ)、印度(2583 g TEQ)、肯尼亚(2754 g TEQ)、尼日利亚(2115 g TEQ)、日本(2057 g TEQ)。网格化排放清单结果显示,二恶英在人口密集的中国东南沿海、印度北部、西欧和尼日利亚中部地区排放量较高。二恶英环境模拟结果表明其主要集中在气相,且模拟值和观测值之间显著相关,验证了本研究编制的全球二恶英网格化排放清单的准确性和可靠性。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.689
Threshold uncertainty score0.626

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLanzhou University Institutional RepositorySame topicToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactFrench-language works237,207