MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6989325258

Aspectos estruturais da família de uma gestante com papilomavírus humano

2008· article· pt· W6989325258 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2008
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicWomen's cancer prevention and management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeelingKinshipNuclear familySubject (documents)Descriptive researchQualitative researchDiseaseExploratory research
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: family can have many definitions as the consanguinity, the kinship and the affinity through marriage. Several factors influence its struc­ ture causing crisis, which include socio-political and economical, religious and cultural factors, such as violence, unemployment, diseases etc. Objec­ tive: to evaluate structural aspects of one family with carrier of Human Papilomavírus (HPV) assisted in a health service, based on the Calgary Model. Methods: descriptive exploratory study, with qualitative approach, using Calgary Model of family evaluation as theoretical reference. The subject of the research was a pregnant woman who had a lesion by HPV, assisted in a Centre of Secondary Attention in the approach to Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD) from Fortaleza - CE. The data collection occured in January, 2007, through interviews and the instrument used was a semi-structured schedule. The speeches were transcribed with consequent execution of discussions and analyzed based on the pertinent literature, and presented through Genogram, Ecomap and family testimony. Results: in this study, we noticed that the disease did not interfere in the matrimonial relationship and in the development of the nuclear family (the couple); the pregnant presents a strong link with her extended family and the nuclear family has a closed family system, with little social interaction. Conclusion: Although the couple relates that there were no great repercussions with the discovery of HPV, the feeling of embarrassment, and fear of being rejected emerged, which confirm the existence of stigmas associated to STD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicWomen's cancer prevention and managementFrench-language works237,207