Aspectos estruturais da família de uma gestante com papilomavírus humano
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: family can have many definitions as the consanguinity, the kinship and the affinity through marriage. Several factors influence its struc ture causing crisis, which include socio-political and economical, religious and cultural factors, such as violence, unemployment, diseases etc. Objec tive: to evaluate structural aspects of one family with carrier of Human Papilomavírus (HPV) assisted in a health service, based on the Calgary Model. Methods: descriptive exploratory study, with qualitative approach, using Calgary Model of family evaluation as theoretical reference. The subject of the research was a pregnant woman who had a lesion by HPV, assisted in a Centre of Secondary Attention in the approach to Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD) from Fortaleza - CE. The data collection occured in January, 2007, through interviews and the instrument used was a semi-structured schedule. The speeches were transcribed with consequent execution of discussions and analyzed based on the pertinent literature, and presented through Genogram, Ecomap and family testimony. Results: in this study, we noticed that the disease did not interfere in the matrimonial relationship and in the development of the nuclear family (the couple); the pregnant presents a strong link with her extended family and the nuclear family has a closed family system, with little social interaction. Conclusion: Although the couple relates that there were no great repercussions with the discovery of HPV, the feeling of embarrassment, and fear of being rejected emerged, which confirm the existence of stigmas associated to STD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".