MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6989424232

Assessments of genetic and reproductive health in Canada’s endangered Oregon Spotted Frog (Rana pretiosa)

2023· dissertation· en· W6989424232 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLu Zone Ul (Laurentian University) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmphibian and Reptile Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndangered speciesThreatened speciesCaptive breedingEx situ conservationPopulationGenetic diversityReproductive successReproductive strategyReproductive biologyGenetic monitoring
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Zoological institutions are increasingly relied upon for ex situ management of species at risk, \nwith conservation breeding and reintroduction programs providing both assurance against \nextinction and a reliable source of offspring to reinforce wild population sizes. Ex situ efforts \nface many challenges, however. One often overlooked challenge is balancing genetic priorities, \nlike retaining genetic diversity and reducing inbreeding, with reproductive priorities, like mate \ncompatibility and reliable breeding, both of which are required for a successful program. Like \nmany amphibians, the Oregon Spotted Frog (Rana pretiosa) is highly threatened in its native \nhabitat and ongoing conservation breeding and reintroduction programs are experiencing \nlimited success; the genetic sustainability of these populations remains unassessed. In this \nstudy, I evaluated the genetic health of both zoo and wild populations of R. pretiosa in Canada \nand investigated some potential causes of the ongoing ex situ reproductive failures associated \nwith egg binding. I found that zoos have maintained stable genetic metrics relative to their wild \nsources, but ongoing collections from wild populations should be reassessed due to low genetic \ndiversity available therein. No clear causes of egg binding were elucidated but I found older \nfemale frogs (> 3 years old) who became egg bound generally had a higher body mass than \nconspecifics, while body mass did not differ in females becoming egg bound in their first \nbreeding season (2-3 years old). This suggests frogs should be monitored for egg binding and \nchanges in body condition differently depending on their age. Overall, there were no significant \ndifferences in genetic or reproductive health across the three zoo conservation breeding \npopulations, but scaled mass index was significantly lower in the zoo with larger holding tanks \nand less genetic management: a reminder of the importance of husbandry and environment in \nconservation breeding program outcomes. The costs and benefits of strict genetic management \nvs. a more communal breeding approach should be carefully considered in light of these results. \nAlong with more cohesion, communication is required between all involved institutions to have \nan effective impact on the conservation of Oregon Spotted Frogs in Canada, the \nrecommendations discussed here have applicability to amphibian ex situ programs worldwide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.429
Threshold uncertainty score0.864

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLu Zone Ul (Laurentian University)Same topicAmphibian and Reptile BiologyFrench-language works237,207