MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6989507205

Associations between organized sport and mental health indices among post-secondary students experiencing disabilities: Social provisions and physical activity guideline adherence matters

2023· article· en· W6989507205 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicElectronic Health Records Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthLonelinessGuidelineSocial engagementSocial environmentPhysical activityPsychological interventionTest (biology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Organized sport is a promising student life activity for promoting campus community engagement, social provisions including social supports/companions, and mental health among students experiencing disabilities (i.e., long-term impairments substantially affecting everyday functioning and societal participation). Drawing on whole-campus perspectives for supporting student mental health, the aim of this study was to test the pathways between sport engagement, social factors (campus climate, social provisions), health behaviour (physical activity [PA] guideline adherence), and mental health indices (psychological distress, well-being, loneliness) among students experiencing disabilities. Path analysis was conducted to examine the direct effects of organized sport on health behaviour, social factors, and mental health. The indirect effects of organized sport on mental health through social factors and health behaviour were also examined. Data from the Spring 2023 national Canadian Campus Well-Being Survey were used (N = 4,608; impairment type: 38% comorbid, 32% mental health, 13% neurological; Mage = 26 (9.07) years; 70% women). Over half (63%) adhered to PA guidelines and only 18% engaged in organized sport. Sport engagement was directly associated with PA guideline adherence, social provisions, well-being, and loneliness (R2 = 0.01–0.26). There were significant indirect effects of organized sport on mental health indices through social provisions (% relative contribution = 26-38%) and PA guideline adherence (% relative contribution = 11-12%). The results have implications for the development of strategies aimed at improving sport participation among students experiencing disabilities, with the overall goal of promoting social provisions, health enhancing engagement in PA, and mental health across Canadian post-secondary campuses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.467
Teacher spread0.414 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectronic Health Records Systems→French-language works237,207→