MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6989723981

Carbon nanotube based targeted drug delivery systems for breast cancer and other drug delivery applications

2015· dissertation· en· W6989723981 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsDrug deliveryBreast cancerTargeted drug deliveryPaclitaxelDrugCancerChemotherapyNanocarriers
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women and the second leading cause of death among all cancers.Surgical removal of breast tumour tissues is the primary treatment for breast cancer.However, this does not rule out relapse at local or distant sites, so, chemotherapy is widely used as an adjuvant therapy.Although effective, chemotherapy drugs often cause severe side effects due to their non-specificity to cancer cells.Nanotechnology for drug delivery is an emerging field focused on targeting drugs to the desirable sites, such as tumour tissues, while minimizing the unwanted side effects of chemotherapy drugs on other tissues.Discovery of a new type of nanomaterial opens more opportunities for drug delivery.The carbon nanotube (CNT) is a novel type of synthetic material that has shown great potential for targeted delivery of anti-cancer agents.The initial hurdle for biomedical applications of CNT has been its hydrophobicity.Proper surface modification of CNT, or CNT functionalization, so as to P a g e | VI ACKNOWLEGEMENTS I would like to express my deep gratitude to my supervisor Dr. Satya Prakash who has provided me the opportunity to work in his lab.I am impressed with his enthusiasm for pursuing new science, which inspired me to explore various unfamiliar areas in my research.I am very grateful for his guidance, advice, encouragement and constant support in my project.On the other hand, I found it very invaluable that

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicCancer Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207