MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6989861365

Captive Minds in Expulsion: Carcerality in the (Mis)Education of Young Black Males

2023· other· en· W6989861365 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueYork University Digital Library (York University) · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisciplineBlack malePrisonSubjectivityHegemonyPower (physics)SanctionsRepresentation (politics)Black female
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Black male students are excluded from school at rates that exceed their representation in the school population. Additionally, school disciplinary sanctions are associated with academic failure, incarceration and anti-social behaviour among Black students. This study explored the experiences and outlooks of excluded Black male youth and how they are constructed in the Ontario education system. It also delved into the ways in which the identities of Black male youth shift as a result of their time in spaces of exclusion, such as expulsion programs. A qualitative Critical Race Methodology was used to formulate deep understanding of subjectivity as it pertains to school excluded Black males. The sample consisted of 13 self-identified Black males (n=13) between the ages of 18-28 years old, who had either graduated from an Ontario Safe Schools expulsion program, completed their term, had been otherwise demitted or decided not to attend. The sample also included two Black mothers (n=2) of the participants. Individual interviews were conducted using a life history method combined with visual timelines. The findings showed that participants experienced expulsion programs as carceral spaces. The spaces significantly influence young Black men’s self concepts and impose upon them what I call carceral identities. Furthermore, in reflecting on their interpretations of hegemonic masculinity, participants revealed a fundamental ontological rupture: the ubiquity of the carceral in the lives of Black boys for whom prison techniques and concentrated disciplinary power have permeated exclusive school spaces, causing a type of dissonance that I refer to as carceral dislocation. The conclusion of this work contributes to theorizations that in addition to establishing a direct path from schools to prisons, these programs are carceral spaces situating the prisons inside of the schools apropos of the school-to-prison pipeline. While this study was conducted prior to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the education system, the findings of this study combined with the mainstream shift to virtual schooling make a case for a radical revisioning of school discipline and uncovering the anti-Blackness inherent in education practices in Ontario.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score0.233

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0150.014
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYork University Digital Library (York University)→French-language works237,207→