MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6989881427

Cement-free biocompatible porous concrete for plant growth

2024· dissertation· en· W6989881427 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTree Root and Stability Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiocompatible materialPorosityPlant growthPorous medium
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biocompatible porous concrete is a specialized type of porous concrete that has mechanical and hydrological properties suitable for supporting plant growth and vegetation establishment.Porous concrete has become increasingly prevalent in urban settings to control stormwater runoff, owing to its ability to facilitate the infiltration of water through its porous structure.Present research on porous concrete also includes its capability to support plant germination and growth, primarily for grasses.Applications of porous concrete capable of supporting plant life have been explored for green infrastructure in urban environments, and for ecological rehabilitation and restoration.The following experiment explores the field application of a cement-free, biocompatible porous concrete substrate with an aggregate size of 2.0-3.2mm, void content of 30 %, and a water-to-binder ratio of 0.2.Sixteen varieties of plants, mostly comprising perennial herbs, were seeded onto the porous concrete substrate for a 4-month field experiment at McGill University's Macdonald Campus Farm.Similar treatments were applied to gravel, sand, and soil for comparison.The experiment was conducted for two growing seasons, with a 40 % reduction in irrigation for the second season.Maximum seedling emergence proportion of clover (Trifolium repens), ruby red orach (Atriplex hortensis var.rubra), microgreen amaranth (Amaranthus tricolor), and turf grass (mixture of tall fescue (Festuca rubra), perennial ryegrass (Lolium perennae), and Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis)) were significantly higher in comparison to other plant species for all substrate treatments for both growing seasons (p < 0.05).Final plant count for turf grass and clover was significantly higher among all plant species for both growing seasons (p < 0.05).Significantly higher canopy height, as well as fresh mass and dry mass yield, was observed for borage (Borago officinalis) and dill (Anethum graveolens) along with clover and turf grass for both growing seasons (p < 0.05).Based on germination rate, final plant count, canopy height, fresh mass yield, and dry mass yield, clover and turf grass were the most successful plant species used for the experiment among all experimental substrates, including porous concrete.Comparison between first and second growing seasons showed no significant difference in germination rate of different plant species (p > 0.05).However, fresh mass and dry mass yield was lower for the second growing season.Effect of location and shading on plant growth performance, as indicated by final plant count and fresh mass yield, was significant across all substrate treatments (p < 0.05).In addition, the influence of incident vi

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicTree Root and Stability StudiesFrench-language works237,207