MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6989935752

The connection between volcanism and plutonism in the Sifton Range volcanic complex, Northern Canadian Cordillera /

2004· dissertation· en· W6989935752 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2004
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Policy and Administration Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPlutonismVolcanismVolcanoPyroclastic rockFelsicVolcanic rockBatholithSillPaleogeneLava
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The early Tertiary marked a period of intense magmatic activity in the Canadian Cordillera as a consequence of tectonic restructuring within the Kula-North American plate system from orthogonal to oblique convergence. Resultant calc-alkaline volcanism formed a discontinuous belt (Challis Arc) along the eastern margin of the Coast Plutonic Complex (CPC) from south-eastern Alaska through Yukon into west-central British Columbia and northern Washington State. The Sifton Range volcanic complex (SRVC) is the Yukon's largest Paleogene erosional remnant of volcanic rocks (240 km2), and represents the only coeval volcanic-plutonic suite within the Sloko-Skukum Group of southern Yukon Territory and northern British Columbia. It comprises a 900-m thick, shallow-dipping, volcanic succession dominated by intermediate to evolved lavas and abundant felsic pyroclastics deposited in a north-westerly trending half-graben. Three volcano-stratigraphic units are documented: (1) Lower Interbedded Unit, (2) Middle lavas, and (3) Upper Interbedded Unit. Locally, the volcanic sequence is intruded by biotite, hornblende, two-feldspar granites of the CPC's Nisling plutonic suite dated at 57.5 Ma. Felsite sills radiate from the main intrusive body, and together with numerous basaltic to dacitic dykes traverse the entire volcanic package. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.861
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicPublic Policy and Administration ResearchFrench-language works237,207