MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6989940315

Competitive biosorption of Ag(I) and Cu (II) by tripolyphosphate crosslinked chitosan beads

2015· other· en· W6989940315 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMemorial University of Newfoundland
KeywordsAdsorptionDiafiltrationBimetallic stripDispersion (optics)Work (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, alkalization of chitosan before crosslinking was applied in to enhance the adsorption capacity of the modified chitosan. Competitive adsorption of Ag (I) and Cu (II) from bimetallic solutions was studied using the newly synthesized tripolyphosphate crosslinked chitosan beads. Results indicated that alkalization before crosslinking helps to protect free-amine groups from crosslinking and hence increases the uptake capacity and selectively of the synthesized beads towards Ag (I). The maximum uptakes of Ag (I) and Cu (II) were 82.9 and 15.5 mg/g respectively at room temperature with an initial concentration of each metal being 2.0 mmol/L and the sorbent dosage of 1.0 g L⁻¹. Langmuir isotherm and pseudo-second order kinetic model provide better descriptions of adsorption isotherm and kinetics of metal ions on sorbent surfaces. Analyses from FT-IR and XPS confirmed that free amine, hydroxyl and P₃O₁₀⁵⁻ groups are involved in metal binding with amine and hydroxyl groups more selective to Ag (I). Then, continuous adsorption with the newly synthesized chitosan beads was simulated using the lumped kinetic model. According to the parameters obtained in the batch adsorption, the overall mass-transfer coefficient (Kf), and axial dispersion coefficient (DL) were determined using the empirical correlations. The value of Kf for Ag (I) is in the range of 5.028×10⁻⁵ s⁻1 to 8.389×10⁻⁵ s⁻¹, the value of Kf for Cu (II) was in the range of 8.000×10⁻⁵ s⁻¹ to 1.283×10⁻⁴ s⁻¹; The range of axial dispersion coefficient for Ag (I) and Cu (II) were both varying from 1.806×10⁻⁴ cm²/s to 1.778×10⁻⁴ cm²/s. Results from the breakthrough and elution profiles indicated that decreasing the flow rate, sample concentration and injection time, or increasing the bed length could enhance the separation of the two metal ions. Besides, it was found that concentration overload by increasing the sample concentration is more effective to improve the separation of two metal ions in fixed-bed column than volume overload by increasing the injection time. In conclusion, the newly synthesized chitosan-based biosorbents showed great selective adsorption for Ag (I) in bimetallic solutions, and the simulation studies provided good potential in industrial applications to recover precious metal ions from water or wastewater.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)French-language works237,207